• Home
  • News
  • Politics
  • Crime
  • Business
  • Sports
  • Health
  • Education
  • Interview
  • Special Report
  • Video
Trumpet News
  • Home
  • News
  • Politics
  • Crime
  • Business
  • Sports
  • Health
  • Education
  • Interview
  • Special Report
  • Video
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • News
  • Politics
  • Crime
  • Business
  • Sports
  • Health
  • Education
  • Interview
  • Special Report
  • Video
No Result
View All Result
Trumpet News
No Result
View All Result
Home Featured

Supreme Court Quashes Age Limit Appeal

Admin Trumpet by Admin Trumpet
April 18, 2019
in Featured, News
0
Katureebe, Bamugemereire Rift Deepens

Chief Justice Bart Katureebe

28
SHARES
0
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

The Supreme Court of Uganda has Thursday quashed the Age Limit Appeal in a ruling that saw three judges rule in favour of the appeal.

The verdict gives President Yoweri Kaguta Museveni green light to contest for the coming Presidential Election.

Chief Justice Bart Katureebe led a Supreme Court panel comprising of justices Stella Arach Amoko, Eldad Mwangusya, Lillian Tibatemwa, Jotham Tumwesigye, Rubby Opio Aweri and Paul Mugamba to deliver judgment.

Katureebe, who said he was sick, delivered the final verdict through

Mwangusya making it four justices against the appeal.

The court delivered judgment on eight key issues including among others.  Whether the learned Justices of the Constitutional Court misdirected themselves on the application of the basic structure doctrine.

Whether majority of the learned justices of the Constitutional Court erred in law and in fact in holding that the entire process of conceptualizing, debating and enactment of Constitution (Amendment) Act 2018 didn’t in any respect contravene nor was it inconsistent with the 1995 Constitution of the Republic of Uganda and The Rules of Procedure of Parliament

Whether the learned Justices of the Constitutional Court erred in law and fact when they held that the violence/scuffle inside and outside Parliament during the enactment of the Constitution (Amendment) Act 2018 did not in any respect contravene the previous  said laws.

Whether the learned Justices of the Constitutional Court erred in law when they applied the substantiality test in determining the petition.

Whether the learned Justices of the Constitutional Court directed themselves when they held that the Constitution (Amendment) Act2018 on the removal of the age limit for the President and Local Council Five offices was not inconsistent with the provisions of the 1995 Constitution.

Whether the Constitutional Court erred in law and fact in holding that the president elected in 2016 is not liable to vacate office on attaining the age of 75 years.

Tags: Age Limit JudgementBart KatureebeBig StorySupreme Court







Categories

Site Links

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org
  • About
  • Advertise
  • Careers
  • Contact

© 2026 JNews - Premium WordPress news & magazine theme by Jegtheme.

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In

Add New Playlist

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • News
  • Politics
  • Crime
  • Business
  • Sports
  • Health
  • Education
  • Interview
  • Special Report
  • Video

© 2026 JNews - Premium WordPress news & magazine theme by Jegtheme.